See how the un-social elements have changed the old definition of the word 'unsocial element'. It was a talk between one of my friends on the occassion of this Holi Festival. He was saying that we meet, eat, drink & enjoy because after all we are social person & it is our duty to celebrate the festival. When I heard this sentence, I was surprised to digest this because it was he who was saying that one who eat,drink & enjoy the festival is only social element and who avoid eating,drinking and enjoying is un-social. And as per his definition I became an un-social element, as such I neither eat the non vegitables,nor drink wine or take any type of drugs.
After his talks, he left, simply leaving a new theory to me. As per his new definition now a days they are social elements who are using alcohol and drugs and also eating non-vege, & one who don't take all this items became un-social. On his face, I could not oppose him but after his leaving I was bound to think over his new definition. And finally I also agreed to his version thinking that the definitions are based on the majorities view. And now a days they are in majority, because, as per experience I also agree that now a days, majority of persons are using either alcohol or drugs and taking non-vege. So my conscious also agreed that when they are in majority, their definition must be upheld.
So I leave this matter with my friends to accept the new definition of un-social element. And also request the authourities of Government to change the old definition of' un-social element.' The old definition might have given in the old days when majority person were not using alcohol/drugs nor taking non-vege.
One may also surprise to know this new theory of socialness, but as a matter of fact the old theory can not be changed easily, which is based on the thinking of Vedas & Pooranas. So we should keep mum & let the majority say whatever they like. After all we all are living in the age of Kaliyooga & it is possiboe to hear all this type of new thinking in the Kaliyooga.
Hari Om Tat sat.
After his talks, he left, simply leaving a new theory to me. As per his new definition now a days they are social elements who are using alcohol and drugs and also eating non-vege, & one who don't take all this items became un-social. On his face, I could not oppose him but after his leaving I was bound to think over his new definition. And finally I also agreed to his version thinking that the definitions are based on the majorities view. And now a days they are in majority, because, as per experience I also agree that now a days, majority of persons are using either alcohol or drugs and taking non-vege. So my conscious also agreed that when they are in majority, their definition must be upheld.
So I leave this matter with my friends to accept the new definition of un-social element. And also request the authourities of Government to change the old definition of' un-social element.' The old definition might have given in the old days when majority person were not using alcohol/drugs nor taking non-vege.
One may also surprise to know this new theory of socialness, but as a matter of fact the old theory can not be changed easily, which is based on the thinking of Vedas & Pooranas. So we should keep mum & let the majority say whatever they like. After all we all are living in the age of Kaliyooga & it is possiboe to hear all this type of new thinking in the Kaliyooga.
Hari Om Tat sat.
